Audit-ready
Invariants, tests, and documentation structured for external review.
Our Services
Contracts engineered for clarity, testability, and external review with operational safeguards from day one.
25+
Production smart contracts shipped
35+
Protocol & token programmes delivered
36+
External audit cycles coordinated
8+
Years of experience
Delivery standard
Invariants, tests, and documentation structured for external review.
EVM and non-EVM deployments with chain choice driven by requirements.
Privileged roles, monitoring hooks, and handover artefacts for production.
Published programmes you can diligence before engaging.
Our services
Nine smart contract disciplines - from core development and security audits to DEX infrastructure, RWA tokenization, and DAO governance - each scoped independently and engineered to production standards on EVM and non-EVM networks.
We design modular, upgradeable smart contracts in Solidity, Rust, and Move - built for auditability, gas optimisation, and multi-chain deployment from day one.
We define role hierarchies, upgrade patterns, and invariant boundaries before a single line of production code is written - eliminating structural risk at the source.
We prepare your contracts for third-party audit with full invariant test suites, documented attack surfaces, and remediation cycles that close findings before sign-off.
We reduce gas consumption across every function, profile failure modes, and document revert paths - cutting transaction costs without compromising contract safety.
We build constant-product and stable-pool AMM contracts with custom routing, slippage controls, and liquidity management logic deployable across target EVM chains.
We engineer multi-sig, MPC-compatible, and account-abstraction wallet contracts with role-gated recovery flows and timelocked execution for institutional-grade custody.
We build isolated lending pool contracts with configurable LTV ratios, liquidation bonuses, and oracle-gated price feeds - engineered for solvency under stress and institutional risk tolerance.
We develop policy-gated mint/burn contracts, NAV oracle integrations, and compliant transfer restriction logic for tokenising real-world assets on regulated and permissioned networks.
We implement weighted delegation, proposal lifecycle contracts, timelocked executors, and guarded treasury operations using battle-tested Governor patterns with custom quorum logic.
Next step
Share your chain, timeline, and constraints - we respond within one business day with a scoped recommendation, not a sales pitch.
Delivery scope
Every engagement produces a defined artifact set. Scope is agreed upfront; nothing is a billable surprise.
Compiler version, inheritance patterns, and testing harness chosen to your risk profile.
Attack surface documented before a line of production code is written.
Invariant suites via Echidna or Foundry fuzzing, not just unit coverage.
Every function profiled; revert paths documented with recovery playbooks.
Deterministic deploys, Etherscan verification, and multisig ceremony scripts.
Findings addressed with root-cause fixes and regression coverage before sign-off.
Tooling stack
Chosen for auditability, community support, and production track record.
Default stack
Solidity · Foundry · Hardhat · OpenZeppelin · Chainlink
EVM chains
Solana, Polkadot, Near
Aptos & Sui
Python-like Ethereum
Blockchain clients
EOS, legacy chains
dApp frontend
Typed Web3 standard
Scripting & testing
StarkNet contracts
Ethereum dev env
Rust-based toolkit
Type-safe Ethereum library
Browser-based IDE
Python framework
Solana framework
Move-based dev
Full-stack starter
Full-stack dApps
Foundry test runner & tooling
Permanent storage
Decentralised market
Distributed protocol
Encrypted cloud
Low-cost network
BitTorrent storage
IPFS incentive layer
P2P on IPFS
Decentralised streams
SQL-like Web3 DB
Ethereum JS library
Legacy ETH library
Blockchain API
ETH/IPFS infra
Indexing protocol
Web3 BaaS
Oracle network
Debug & monitor
Secure libraries
Static analysis tool
Wallet & dApp UX
Trust & diligence
We coordinate preparation and remediation with recognised third-party audit firms your stakeholders already trust - a strong signal for investors, listings, and users.
Third-party names and marks belong to their respective owners.
Partner with us
Smart contracts are financial infrastructure. A single exploited vulnerability can drain liquidity, collapse protocol trust, and end a product. We build for the teams who understand that with invariant testing, third-party audit coordination, and deployment pipelines that leave no ambiguity in the handoff.
Why Bitronix
Not a feature list. Six specific reasons clients who've worked with other firms come back to us - and stay.
We write contracts for external reviewers, not just for deployment. Every function is documented, every invariant is encoded, and every attack surface is mapped before a single line goes to audit - cutting review time and findings count on every engagement.
You see every architectural decision, every test result, and every threat model output as we build. No end-of-sprint surprises. Enterprise clients get a live documentation trail they can hand to their own security team or board at any point in the engagement.
We work across EVM networks, Solana, Aptos, Sui, and StarkNet - not because we list them in a brochure, but because our case studies are deployed across them. Chain selection is driven by your requirements, not our tooling comfort zone.
Audit findings are part of the engagement, not a change order. We triage, fix, and regression-test every finding through to auditor sign-off without renegotiating scope. You know the full cost before we start.
Most firms disappear after deployment. We provide on-chain monitoring via Tenderly, incident response with defined SLAs, and scheduled upgrade operations - because a contract that can't be safely operated post-launch isn't finished, it's deferred risk.
Our case studies are public, our tech stacks are listed, and our audit partners are named. ProSwap, Meridian Lending, Harbor RWA, Citadel DAO - read the architecture, check the chains, verify the firms. We don't ask you to trust us; we give you the evidence to decide.
Partner selection
Choosing a smart contract development company is not a procurement decision - it is a security decision. The wrong choice does not show up in a missed deadline; it shows up in a drained treasury, a collapsed protocol, or a regulator inquiry. Bitronix is the smart contract development company institutional teams, DeFi protocols, and enterprises engage when the cost of a single vulnerability exceeds the cost of the engagement many times over.
Every contract is written for external review from the first line of code - documented invariants, mapped attack surfaces, and audit preparation packs delivered as part of the engagement, not billed as extras.
ProSwap, Meridian Lending, and Harbor RWA are deployed, named, and diligencable on-chain. Our case studies are not anonymised project descriptions - they are real programmes you can verify.
Established relationships with CertiK, Hacken, QuillAudits, Hashlock, SolidProof, and ChainSecurity mean your contracts arrive at review with the structure and documentation those firms expect - cutting review time and findings count on every engagement.
If you are evaluating a smart contract development company on anything other than audit readiness, deployment evidence, and post-launch operational coverage, you are evaluating the wrong criteria.
Security & testing methodology
Most audit findings are discoverable before external review. We eliminate the preventable ones so your audit firm spends time on substance - not archaeology.
Before writing production code, we document every asset flow, privilege boundary, and external dependency. Attack surfaces are mapped to STRIDE categories and prioritised by exploitability and impact - giving reviewers a structured target list, not a codebase to reverse-engineer.
We define what must always be true about your system - total supply conservation, access control boundaries, solvency conditions - and encode these as on-chain invariants tested via Echidna and Foundry's fuzzing engine across millions of execution paths, not just the happy path.
For complex financial logic, we run differential tests against reference implementations and property-based suites that explore edge cases no unit test would reach. This catches precision loss, rounding errors, and state transitions that only surface under adversarial conditions.
Every public and external function is profiled for gas consumption across realistic calldata distributions. Revert paths are documented with recovery playbooks - so operators know exactly what failed, why, and how to respond without reading the source code under pressure.
For high-value invariants - token supply bounds, liquidation solvency, access control - we apply formal verification tooling where the cost of a missed edge case exceeds the cost of proof. We don't apply it everywhere; we apply it where a unit test passing gives false confidence.
Every engagement produces a structured handoff document: natspec-complete code, documented invariants, test coverage reports, known limitations, and a threat model your auditors can diligence end to end. External reviewers consistently cite preparation quality as the single biggest factor in audit speed and cost.
Our methodology is available to review before you engage.
Industries
Nine industries where smart contracts are eliminating intermediaries, automating compliance, and creating verifiable audit trails - from gaming economies and government records to healthcare data and insurance claims.
We build smart contract infrastructure for in-game asset ownership, player-to-player trading, and tournament prize distribution - creating tamper-proof economies where digital ownership is verifiable on-chain and fraud is structurally impossible.
Learn moreWe develop immutable record systems for voting, land registry, tax collection, and public procurement - giving government agencies a transparent, tamper-proof audit trail that reduces administrative overhead and eliminates opportunities for record manipulation.
Learn moreWe build royalty distribution and rights management contracts that pay creators automatically on each use - removing collection agencies from the payment chain and ensuring compensation is triggered by verifiable on-chain events, not manual reconciliation.
Learn moreWe develop self-sovereign identity contracts that give individuals portable, cryptographically verifiable credentials - enabling organisations to verify identity across systems without storing sensitive data in centralised databases vulnerable to breach.
Learn moreWe build provenance and custody tracking contracts that create an immutable record of goods from origin to delivery - giving enterprises, regulators, and end consumers a single verifiable source of truth that intermediaries cannot alter.
Learn moreWe engineer lending protocol contracts with automated collateral management, liquidation triggers, and interest accrual - enabling platforms to offer faster, cheaper credit with risk parameters enforced by code rather than manual underwriting processes.
Learn moreWe develop tokenised property contracts and automated settlement rails that reduce transaction timelines from weeks to hours - removing escrow intermediaries, automating title transfer conditions, and creating a transparent ownership record on-chain.
Learn moreWe build patient-controlled medical data contracts that enable secure, permissioned sharing between providers and researchers - giving patients verifiable control over who accesses their data while creating an auditable consent trail regulators can inspect.
Learn moreWe develop parametric insurance contracts that trigger payouts automatically when oracle-verified conditions are met - eliminating manual claims processing, reducing fraud surface, and delivering compensation to policyholders in hours rather than weeks.
Learn moreExecution model
No handoffs that lose context. The team that scopes your project ships it and supports it post-launch. Every phase produces a defined artifact - nothing moves forward without it.
Timeline: 3-5 business days
We map your business logic, asset flows, stakeholder roles, and go-live constraints. We identify chain requirements, custody model, and upgrade strategy before any architecture decisions are made.
Timeline: 5-10 business days
We define contract structure, role hierarchies, access control patterns, and upgrade paths. Every architectural decision is documented with the reasoning and the rejected alternatives - so your team and auditors understand why the system is built the way it is.
Timeline: 3-8 weeks depending on contract complexity
We build modular, natspec-documented contracts against the architecture spec. Unit tests, integration tests, invariant suites, and fuzz campaigns run continuously - not as a final check before handoff. Every PR is reviewed against the threat model.
Timeline: 2-6 weeks depending on audit firm availability
We prepare and submit the audit preparation pack to your chosen firm or coordinate selection from our partner network. We manage the findings triage, implement root-cause fixes (not patches), write regression tests for every finding, and work through fix cycles until the auditor issues sign-off.
Timeline: 3-5 business days
We execute a deterministic deployment with reproducible bytecode, verify contracts on Etherscan and block explorers, run the multisig ceremony with your key holders, and configure on-chain monitoring before declaring the system live. Nothing is rushed at this stage.
Timeline: Ongoing - retainer or per-incident
We monitor on-chain activity, respond to incidents with defined SLAs, execute scheduled upgrade operations, and review contracts as network conditions or protocol dependencies change. The same engineers who built the system are on-call - not a support tier who's reading the code for the first time.
Timelines assume responsive client feedback at phase gates. Audit firm availability is the most variable factor - we recommend reserving audit slots 4-6 weeks in advance of your target launch date.
How we partner
Three ways to engage - structured around how your team works, not how we prefer to sell. Every model operates on the same delivery standard, the same engineering team, and the same accountability chain.
3-12 months · 2-5 engineers · Full-time exclusive
Your programme gets a dedicated smart contract engineer, security reviewer, and DevOps engineer working exclusively on your codebase - no context-switching between client projects, no junior handoffs mid-engagement. Suited to protocols building from scratch with ongoing audit cycles, upgrade operations, and post-launch monitoring requirements.
Best for: Greenfield protocol development, DeFi platforms, long-runway enterprise programmes
1-6 months · 1-3 engineers · Integrated with your team
We embed directly into your existing engineering team - attending standups, working in your repositories, and operating inside your review processes. You retain architectural ownership; we bring smart contract security expertise, testing infrastructure, and audit preparation capability your team doesn't have in-house yet.
Best for: In-house teams approaching audit, teams adding new contract modules to live protocols, engineering orgs scaling smart contract capability
4-16 weeks · Fixed deliverables · Fixed price
A defined scope, a defined artifact set, and a defined price agreed before work begins. Discovery through deployment - or any individual phase - delivered against a milestone schedule with no billable surprises. Audit preparation packs, standalone contract modules, and security reviews are common project-based engagements.
Best for: Specific contract deliverables, audit readiness programmes, one-time migrations or upgrades
Not sure which model fits? Book a 30-min scoping call → - we'll recommend the right structure based on your team, timeline, and contract complexity.
Case studies
From AMM routing and lending risk engines to RWA settlement rails and timelocked governance - contract programmes you can diligence end to end.
Uniswap-style AMM DEX development - constant-product and stable pools, swap router, and liquidity analytics on MERN + Solidity
ProSwap is a custom decentralized exchange (DEX) we built in the Uniswap tradition: an automated market maker with constant-product and stable-style pools, configurable slippage controls, and a swap router the client could brand and deploy to their target chain. Bitronix delivered the full AMM stack - Solidity pool and router contracts, a trader-facing swap app, pool analytics, and an operator panel - engineered for a controlled mainnet launch.
$4.2M liquidity bootstrapped in first 72 hours post-launch across 3 pool pairs.
Tech stack
DeFi lending protocol development - isolated pools, configurable LTV, risk-bounded liquidations, and Chainlink oracle safeguards
Meridian is an isolated-pool DeFi lending protocol we engineered for institutional desks. It pairs aggressive capital efficiency with conservative risk controls: per-asset silos, configurable loan-to-value (LTV) and liquidation bonuses, and predictable auction paths that keep solvency provable under stress. Bitronix delivered the full lending-protocol surface - Solidity markets, oracle safeguards, and a composable liquidation router - built audit-ready from day one.
Zero solvency events across 14 months of live operation under adverse market conditions.
Tech stack
RWA tokenization development - policy-gated minting, NAV oracle quorum, and qualified-custodian segregation on Ethereum
Harbor is on-chain settlement infrastructure we built for tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). It connects off-chain custody and attestations to transferable reference tokens: mint and burn paths are policy-gated, NAV updates are bound to a signer quorum, and redemption queues stay observable to both issuers and investors. Bitronix engineered the full settlement surface - core contracts, compliance modules, and verification tooling - to mirror fund rules while keeping investor data off-chain.
$28M in regulated asset references settled on-chain across 6 institutional counterparties.
Tech stack
Google reviews
Verified feedback from our Google Business Profile.
Other services
Explore neighbouring practices - same delivery bar, shared architectural standards.
Enterprise Blockchain
Permissioned ledgers for regulated industries
View servicedApp Development
Interfaces & backends built for chain edge cases
View serviceDAO Development
Governance contracts, treasury, and voting
View serviceAI Automation Systems
Agents, workflows, and integrations with operational guardrails
View serviceDeFi Platforms
AMMs, lending, perpetuals, and yield infrastructure
View serviceBlockchain Development
Protocol engineering, node operations, and cross-chain infrastructure
View serviceCoin & Token Development
Tokenomics, vesting, sale infrastructure, and listing readiness
View serviceNFT Development
Collections, royalties, minting, and marketplace contracts
View serviceGenerative AI Solutions
AI-native products, RAG, fine-tuning, evaluation, and multimodal delivery
View serviceRWA Tokenization
Compliant on-chain asset representation
View serviceWeb3 Game Development
On-chain assets, economies, and smart contract logic
View serviceFAQ
Straight answers for engineering and procurement teams - before you enter diligence.
We prepare your contracts for third-party audit - covering invariant documentation, test coverage, and attack surface mapping - then coordinate review with your chosen firm or recommend one from our trusted network. We implement all remediations and manage fix cycles through to sign-off.
We recommend upgrade patterns based on your risk profile: immutable cores with peripheral upgrade modules for maximum security, transparent proxies with timelocks for operational flexibility, or migration flows with state transfer scripts for full redeployment. Every pattern ships with operator runbooks and rollback procedures.
EVM-compatible networks are our primary environment - Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, and BNB Chain. We also support Solana (Anchor/Rust), Aptos and Sui (Move), and StarkNet (Cairo). Chain selection is driven by your liquidity, custody, and regulatory requirements, not our tooling preferences.
Yes. We design oracle boundaries with Chainlink price feeds, heartbeat checks, and circuit breakers for market-sensitive functions. For automation we integrate Chainlink Automation or Gelato with failure-mode documentation. Every off-chain data dependency is treated as a trust boundary and modelled in the threat assessment.
Six phases: Discovery (scope, threat model, chain selection) → Architecture (role design, upgrade path, invariant spec) → Development (contracts, test suites, tooling) → Audit (external review, fix cycles, regression coverage) → Launch (deterministic deploy, Etherscan verification, multisig ceremony) → Support (incident response, monitoring, upgrade operations). Each phase produces a defined artifact set agreed upfront.
Both. For existing codebases we begin with a code review and threat assessment before scoping remediation or extension work. We document what we inherit, flag technical debt, and establish a test baseline before writing a single line of new code. Greenfield projects follow the full six-phase process from Discovery.
Every finding is triaged by severity - critical, high, medium, low, and informational. Critical and high findings receive root-cause fixes, not patches. Each fix ships with a regression test that proves the vulnerability is closed. We produce a remediation report your audit firm can verify before issuing the final certificate.
A standard greenfield contract programme - from Discovery through audit-ready deployment - typically runs 8-16 weeks depending on contract complexity and audit firm availability. Team structure is a lead smart contract engineer, a security-focused reviewer, and a DevOps engineer for deployment pipelines. Timeline and team size are scoped per engagement, not templated.
Yes. Post-launch support covers on-chain monitoring with Tenderly alerts, incident response with defined SLAs, scheduled upgrade operations, and gas optimisation reviews as network conditions change. Support is available as a retainer or on a per-incident basis depending on your operational requirements.
The most useful starting point is: target chain and network, type of contract (token, protocol, governance, etc.), approximate TVL or transaction volume at launch, your preferred audit firm if you have one, and your go-live timeline. We respond within one business day with a scoped recommendation. No NDA required for an initial conversation.