Our Services

RWA Tokenization & Issuance Infrastructure

Compliant on-chain representation of regulated assets - engineered for transfer restrictions, NAV attestation, qualified custody, and the operational realities of regulated issuance.

Book a Strategy Call →View case studies

or download our RWA tokenization readiness checklist →

  • $1.2B+

    Regulated asset value tokenized across deployments

  • 50+

    Issuance programmes shipped across asset classes

  • 12+

    Jurisdictions covered across deployments

  • 8+

    Years of regulated infrastructure engineering

Our services

RWA Tokenization Services

Nine RWA engineering disciplines - from policy-gated issuance and NAV oracle integration to fund administration interfaces and qualified custody coordination - each scoped independently and engineered for regulated production environments.

Tokenized Securities & Bonds

We build policy-gated security token contracts (ERC-3643, ERC-1400) with whitelist registries, transfer restrictions, and exemption-pattern transfer logic embedded at the contract layer as your counsel specifies.

Tokenized Real Estate

We deploy property-backed token contracts with SPV-anchored ownership, rent-distribution logic, and title-verification oracle integration - designed for regulated transfer flows and investor onboarding.

Tokenized Funds & Money Market

We engineer fund-share token contracts with NAV oracle integration, subscription/redemption queues, and fund administrator integration for regulated open-end and closed-end vehicles.

Tokenized Commodities & Carbon

We build commodity-backed and carbon-credit token contracts with attestation oracles, custodian-anchored mint paths, and registry-compatible burn-on-retirement logic.

Tokenized Private Credit

We deploy private credit and trade finance token contracts with cash-flow waterfall logic, originator attestation, and investor reporting infrastructure for regulated credit programmes.

Compliance & Transfer Restriction Logic

We implement KYC/AML attestation flows, accredited investor verification, jurisdictional transfer restrictions, and lock-up enforcement at the contract layer - producing audit trails your examiners can review.

NAV Oracle & Attestation Infrastructure

We design signer-quorum NAV update flows, third-party attestation integrations, and on-chain proof-of-reserve mechanisms for fund administrators and custodians.

Custody & Settlement Integration

We connect tokenized issuance to qualified custodians, transfer agents, and traditional settlement rails - including T+0/T+1 reconciliation patterns and bank custody bridges as your programme defines.

Investor Onboarding & Reporting

We build KYC-gated subscription flows, accredited investor verification, regulatory reporting dashboards, and audit-ready transaction lineage for issuers and regulators.

Next step

Ready to scope your RWA programme?

Share your asset class, jurisdictions, and target launch - we respond within one business day with a scoped recommendation, not a sales pitch.

Book a Strategy Call →Schedule a 30-min call

Delivery scope

Six deliverables, zero ambiguity.

Every engagement produces a defined artifact set. Scope is agreed upfront; nothing is a billable surprise.

01

Regulatory & jurisdictional mapping

Asset class, exemption framework your counsel selects, and transfer restriction matrix documented in coordination with your counsel before architecture decisions.

02

Token standard & compliance architecture

Standard selection (for example ERC-3643, ERC-1400, or a custom pattern), whitelist registry design, and on-contract compliance logic specified for the asset class and jurisdictions in scope.

03

NAV & attestation oracle design

Signer quorum, attestation cadence, and fallback procedures for NAV updates, proof-of-reserve, and custody confirmations defined and stress-tested.

04

Custody & transfer-agent integration

Integration interfaces with qualified custodians, transfer agents, and fund administrators specified - including reconciliation flows and break procedures.

05

Audit-ready contract codebase

Natspec-complete contracts with invariant tests, compliance simulation, and gas profiling - handed to your audit firm or ours with no preparation gap.

06

Operational runbooks & regulatory reporting

Documented procedures for mint/burn ceremonies, NAV updates, transfer disputes, regulatory reporting, and audit-trail export - handed to your operations and compliance teams.

Tooling stack

Our RWA Tokenization Technology Stack

Chosen for regulatory compatibility, custodian integration track record, and production reliability across regulated issuance programmes.

Default stack

Solidity · ERC-3643 · Chainlink Proof-of-Reserve · Hyperledger Besu · OpenZeppelin

Programming languages & frameworks

  • Solidity

    EVM contracts

  • Vyper

    Audit-friendly EVM

  • TypeScript

    Tooling & SDKs

  • Rust

    Solana SPL securities

  • Go

    Permissioned chain modules

  • Python

    Compliance modelling

  • Java

    Hyperledger Fabric chaincode

  • Foundry

    Test & deploy framework

  • Hardhat

    Dev environment

  • Move

    Aptos & Sui

RWA standards & frameworks

  • ERC-3643

    T-REX security token

  • ERC-1400

    Security token standard

  • ERC-1404

    Restricted transfers

  • ERC-4626

    Tokenised vault

  • OpenZeppelin

    Secure libraries

  • Tokenfactor

    Compliance framework

  • Polymath

    Security token toolkit

  • Securitize

    Issuance platform

  • Provenance

    RWA blockchain

  • Centrifuge Tinlake

    RWA architecture

Networks & deployment targets

  • Ethereum

    Public L1 issuance

  • Hyperledger Besu

    Enterprise EVM

  • Polygon

    EVM scaling

  • Avalanche

    Subnet for regulated assets

  • Arbitrum

    L2 issuance

  • Provenance

    RWA-native L1

  • Stellar

    Cross-border settlement

  • Quorum

    Permissioned EVM

  • Hyperledger Fabric

    Permissioned

  • Canton

    Privacy-preserving DLT

Compliance, oracle & integration tools

  • Chainlink Proof-of-Reserve

    Reserve attestation

  • Chainlink Functions

    Off-chain computation

  • Chainlink CCIP

    Cross-chain messaging

  • Chainalysis

    AML monitoring

  • TRM Labs

    Compliance screening

  • Onfido

    KYC verification

  • Sumsub

    KYC/AML platform

  • Fireblocks

    Institutional custody

  • Anchorage

    Qualified custody

  • BNY Mellon

    Traditional custody bridge

Trust & diligence

Audit Partner Ecosystem

We coordinate audit and code review with recognised third-party firms your stakeholders, regulators, custodians, and institutional allocators already trust - a critical signal for regulated issuance programmes and fund administrator diligence.

CertiK(opens in a new tab)Hacken(opens in a new tab)QuillAudits(opens in a new tab)Hashlock(opens in a new tab)SolidProof(opens in a new tab)ChainSecurity(opens in a new tab)

Third-party names and marks belong to their respective owners.

Partner with us

Built for Issuers Where Compliance Isn't Optional.

RWA tokenization isn't DeFi with a regulatory veneer. A misconfigured transfer restriction creates an unregistered securities offering. A failed NAV update strands fund subscriptions. A custody integration that breaks reconciliation triggers an SEC inquiry, not a Twitter post-mortem. We build for issuers, fund administrators, and asset managers who treat tokenization as regulated financial infrastructure - with compliance logic at the contract layer, attested NAV flows, and operational handoff that satisfies your auditors, regulators, and qualified custodians from day one.

Book a Strategy Call →

Why Bitronix

What Makes Bitronix Different

Not a feature list. Six specific reasons issuers, fund administrators, and asset managers choose Bitronix for tokenization programmes that must clear legal review, satisfy regulators, and integrate with traditional custody and settlement infrastructure.

01

Compliance-First Engineering

We don't bolt compliance onto crypto contracts. Whitelist registries, transfer restrictions, jurisdictional logic, and lock-up enforcement are designed at the contract layer - coordinated with your counsel before development begins. Your regulators see compliance as code, not as a policy document hoping the contract behaves.

02

Custodian & Transfer Agent Aware

We integrate with qualified custodians (Anchorage, Fireblocks, BNY Mellon), transfer agents, and fund administrators as a default deliverable - not as a custom add-on. The reconciliation flows, break procedures, and operational handoffs are specified before contract development, not improvised after.

03

No Black-Box Development

You see every architectural decision, every test result, and every compliance-logic output as we build. Your legal, compliance, and operations teams get a live documentation trail they can review at any phase - and hand to regulators, auditors, and institutional allocators during diligence.

04

Network-Aware for Regulated Assets

We deploy across public L1s, permissioned networks (Hyperledger Besu, Quorum, Canton), and privacy-preserving chains based on your regulatory and counterparty requirements - not on our tooling preferences. Custodian integration, observability, and transfer-agent compatibility drive the chain decision.

05

Operational Handoff Included

Documentation, regulatory reporting flows, and audit-trail exports are part of the engagement, not a change order. Your compliance team takes over with confidence - or we stay on retainer through your regulatory examinations and audits.

06

A Track Record You Can Diligence

Our case studies are public, our tech stacks are listed, and our partners are named. Read the architecture, check the chains, verify the firms. We give regulators, custodians, and allocators the evidence to decide - not asks to trust.

Review our case studies →

Security & testing methodology

How We Build Tokenization Programmes That Survive Regulatory Examination.

Most RWA tokenization failures aren't smart contract bugs - they're compliance gaps, custody integration breaks, and NAV reconciliation failures that surface during regulatory examination. We engineer the preventable ones out so your programme earns regulatory confidence, not enforcement action.

01

Regulatory Mapping First

Before contract code is written, we map your asset class to the exemption framework your counsel selects (for example Reg D, Reg S, Reg A+, MiCA, MAS). Transfer restrictions, holding period requirements, jurisdictional gating, and accredited investor verification are documented before architecture decisions - so the contract enforces what your counsel intends.

02

Compliance-as-Code Validation

Whitelist registries, transfer restrictions, and lock-up enforcement are encoded as on-chain compliance logic and tested against every transfer scenario your asset class encounters: secondary transfers, inheritance, custodian rebalancing, jurisdictional changes. Logic errors are caught before they become operational incidents.

03

NAV & Attestation Stress Testing

Signer quorum failures, custodian downtime, oracle delays, and attestation discrepancies are simulated before launch. NAV update flows, proof-of-reserve verification, and fund administrator integration are tested under failure modes - not only nominal paths.

04

Custody & Settlement Integration

We integrate with qualified custodians, transfer agents, and traditional settlement infrastructure (including DTCC-aligned patterns where applicable, bank custody, and fund administrator platforms) and validate end-to-end reconciliation. Break procedures are documented before launch, not improvised during the first reconciliation incident.

05

Audit Trail & Reporting Validation

Every regulated action - mint, burn, transfer, NAV update, compliance check - produces an audit trail your regulators, auditors, and fund administrators can export and verify. Reporting flows are validated against your existing compliance reporting cadence.

06

Audit Preparation Pack

Every engagement produces a structured handoff: natspec-complete code, documented invariants, compliance logic specification, custodian and transfer-agent integration documentation, NAV attestation flow diagrams, and a threat model your auditors and regulators can due diligence end to end.

Our methodology is available to review before you engage.

Asset classes

Tokenization Programmes Across Asset Classes

Nine asset categories where tokenization is replacing legacy issuance, settlement, and investor servicing infrastructure - under regulated conditions.

Real Estate

Property-backed tokens, fractional ownership instruments, and rent-distributing receipts - issued through SPVs with regulated transfer restrictions, title-verification oracles, and NAV reporting integrated with property administrators.

Learn more

Private Credit

Private credit, trade finance, and direct lending tokens with cash-flow waterfall logic, originator attestation, and investor reporting - engineered for regulated credit programmes and qualified institutional buyers.

Learn more

Funds & Asset Management

Fund-share tokens for private funds, money market funds, and tokenized treasuries - with NAV oracle integration, subscription/redemption queues, and fund administrator integration.

Learn more

Government

Tokenized treasury bonds, municipal debt, and CBDC pilots - issued on permissioned or hybrid networks with regulator-grade reporting and traditional settlement integration.

Learn more

Commodities

Gold, oil, and agricultural commodity tokens with custodian-anchored mint paths, attestation oracles, and physical-delivery redemption flows.

Learn more

Carbon & ESG

Carbon credit issuance, retirement, and trading instruments with registry integration (Verra, Gold Standard), attestation oracles, and ESG reporting infrastructure.

Learn more

Healthcare

Royalty-backed tokens for pharmaceutical revenue streams, clinical-trial financing instruments, and tokenized receivables - designed for regulated investor pools and HIPAA-compatible attestation.

Learn more

Insurance

Catastrophe bonds, reinsurance treaty tokens, and parametric coverage instruments - settling against oracle-verified events with regulated transfer restrictions.

Learn more

Art & Collectibles

Fractionalized fine art, luxury asset tokens, and collectibles-backed instruments - with custodian-anchored authenticity attestation and regulated investor onboarding.

Learn more

Execution model

Six Phases, One Accountability Chain.

No handoffs that lose context. The team that scopes your RWA tokenization programme ships it and supports it post-launch. Every phase produces a defined artifact - nothing moves forward without it.

Phase 1: Discovery & Regulatory Mapping

Timeline: 1-2 weeks

What happens

Asset class, exemption framework your counsel defines, jurisdictional scope, custodian arrangements, and compliance requirements mapped in coordination with your counsel before architecture decisions.

Deliverables

  • Scope document with in/out boundaries
  • Regulatory exemption mapping (as directed by counsel)
  • Transfer restriction matrix
  • Custodian and transfer-agent integration register
  • Engagement timeline with phase gates

Phase 2: Architecture & Compliance Design

Timeline: 2-4 weeks

What happens

Token standard, whitelist registry, compliance logic, NAV oracle topology, and custody integration interfaces documented - including alignment with counsel's interpretation of applicable rules.

Deliverables

  • Architecture specification
  • Compliance logic specification
  • NAV attestation flow design
  • Custodian integration interface contracts
  • Regulatory reporting plan

Phase 3: Development

Timeline: 4-12 weeks depending on scope

What happens

Token contracts, compliance logic, oracle infrastructure, and integration services built against the spec with continuous compliance simulation in CI.

Deliverables

  • Production contract codebase with full natspec
  • Unit and integration test suite (target 100% line coverage)
  • Compliance simulation suite
  • Gas profiling report
  • Custodian integration services
  • Deployment scripts

Phase 4: Audit & Compliance Validation

Timeline: 3-8 weeks depending on audit firm availability

What happens

Contracts submitted to chosen firm; compliance logic validated against legal review; custodian and transfer-agent integration end-to-end tested. Findings triaged and remediated through to sign-off.

Deliverables

  • Audit preparation pack
  • Findings triage report
  • Root-cause fix per critical/high finding
  • Regression test per finding
  • Legal review confirmation of compliance logic interpretation
  • Final audit certificate coordination

Phase 5: Launch

Timeline: 1-3 weeks

What happens

Deterministic deployment, custodian onboarding, transfer-agent integration cutover, regulatory reporting activation, and investor-facing infrastructure go-live against explicit launch criteria.

Deliverables

  • Deployment transaction record with verified bytecode
  • Block explorer verification
  • Custodian integration cutover log
  • Regulatory reporting activation
  • Post-deployment reconciliation verification

Phase 6: Support

Timeline: Ongoing - retainer or per-incident

What happens

Compliance monitoring, NAV update operations, custodian reconciliation oversight, regulatory reporting cycles, and incident response under defined SLAs.

Deliverables

  • Compliance and operations dashboard
  • Incident response playbook with severity matrix
  • NAV update calendar and operations
  • Monthly compliance review (optional retainer tier)
  • Regulatory examination support process

Timelines assume responsive client feedback at phase gates and prompt counsel review at regulatory checkpoints. Legal review of compliance logic, custodian onboarding, and audit firm scheduling are typically the pacing items - programmes targeting a specific regulatory window should engage Discovery 4-6 months before target issuance.

How we partner

Engagement Models

Three ways to engage - structured around how your team works, not how we prefer to sell. Every model operates on the same delivery standard, the same engineering team, and the same accountability chain.

01

Dedicated Development Team

3-12 months · 2-5 engineers · Full-time exclusive

Your RWA tokenization programme gets a lead contracts engineer, compliance-aware reviewer, and integrations specialist working exclusively on your issuance - no context-switching. Suited to full issuance programmes, multi-asset rollouts, and post-launch operations.

Best for: Flagship issuance, regulated multi-jurisdiction programmes, teams replacing vendors mid-flight

02

Team Extension

1-6 months · 1-3 engineers · Integrated with your team

We embed with your legal, fund ops, and engineering teams - working in your repositories and programme rooms. You retain counsel-led regulatory interpretation; we bring contract-layer compliance encoding, custodian integration depth, and NAV attestation expertise.

Best for: In-house teams shipping a major issuance, asset managers extending to new instruments, treasury-led tokenization

03

Project-Based

4-16 weeks · Fixed deliverables · Fixed price

Defined scope and price agreed before work begins. Issuance programmes, custodian integration sprints, and regulatory readiness reviews are common project-based formats - milestone gates and no billable surprises.

Best for: Issuance programmes, custodian integration sprints, regulatory readiness reviews, NAV oracle cutovers

Not sure which model fits? Book a 30-min scoping call → - we'll recommend the right structure based on your team, timeline, and RWA tokenization programme scope.

Case studies

Real work, real results.

Regulated issuance programmes, custodian integrations, and investor reporting - programmes you can diligence end to end. Case narratives are placeholders; verify against real client work before publishing.

RWA & Tokenisation

Harbor RWA Settlement: On-Chain Rails for Tokenized Real-World Assets

RWA tokenization development - policy-gated minting, NAV oracle quorum, and qualified-custodian segregation on Ethereum

Harbor is on-chain settlement infrastructure we built for tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). It connects off-chain custody and attestations to transferable reference tokens: mint and burn paths are policy-gated, NAV updates are bound to a signer quorum, and redemption queues stay observable to both issuers and investors. Bitronix engineered the full settlement surface - core contracts, compliance modules, and verification tooling - to mirror fund rules while keeping investor data off-chain.

$28M in regulated asset references settled on-chain across 6 institutional counterparties with zero reconciliation breaks across 11 months.

Tech stack

  • Solidity
  • Hardhat
  • IPFS
  • TypeScript
  • Ethereum
Read case study →
DeFi

Meridian Lending Markets: Isolated-Pool DeFi Lending for Institutional Desks

DeFi lending protocol development - isolated pools, configurable LTV, risk-bounded liquidations, and Chainlink oracle safeguards

Meridian is an isolated-pool DeFi lending protocol we engineered for institutional desks. It pairs aggressive capital efficiency with conservative risk controls: per-asset silos, configurable loan-to-value (LTV) and liquidation bonuses, and predictable auction paths that keep solvency provable under stress. Bitronix delivered the full lending-protocol surface - Solidity markets, oracle safeguards, and a composable liquidation router - built audit-ready from day one.

Isolated lending markets with provable solvency semantics and conservative oracle fail-closed behaviour.

Tech stack

  • Solidity
  • Foundry
  • Chainlink
  • TypeScript
  • Ethereum
Read case study →
DeFi

ProSwap: A Uniswap-Style AMM DEX with Custom Pools and Swap Routing

Uniswap-style AMM DEX development - constant-product and stable pools, swap router, and liquidity analytics on MERN + Solidity

ProSwap is a custom decentralized exchange (DEX) we built in the Uniswap tradition: an automated market maker with constant-product and stable-style pools, configurable slippage controls, and a swap router the client could brand and deploy to their target chain. Bitronix delivered the full AMM stack - Solidity pool and router contracts, a trader-facing swap app, pool analytics, and an operator panel - engineered for a controlled mainnet launch.

On-chain liquidity infrastructure suitable for tokenised asset pairs and controlled routing.

Tech stack

  • MongoDB
  • Express
  • React
  • Node.js
  • Solidity
  • Ethereum
  • TypeScript
Read case study →
FinTech

Uwin: A Polymarket-Style Prediction Market with On-Chain Settlement

Polymarket-style prediction market development - outcome-share trading, Chainlink resolution, and collateral accounting on MEAN/MERN + Solidity

Uwin is a custom prediction market platform we built end-to-end, inspired by Polymarket: traders buy and sell outcome shares on real-world events, with transparent resolution rules and deep liquidity across binary and multi-outcome markets. Bitronix delivered the full surface - trader app, operator console, smart contracts, and oracle-backed settlement - rather than skinning a generic template.

Collateralised outcome markets with oracle boundaries suited to objective settlement workflows.

Tech stack

  • MongoDB
  • Express
  • React
  • Angular
  • Node.js
  • Solidity
  • Chainlink
Read case study →
View all case studies →

Google reviews

Hear from our clients

Verified feedback from our Google Business Profile.

Google

Excellent service and communication, fast response and transparent , will do more business in future.

Mohd Shahzad

Google review

Google

A extremely brilliant experience. We are mesmerised by their services and the immense knowledge they have in their field. We certainly look forward to have a great relationship with this company and hope to do many projects together, learning and using their expertise for our business.

M محمد Riaz Vali Sayed

Google review

Google

My experience with Bitronix Technologies was excellent The staff were polite and professional, communication was clear, and the project was completed on schedule. Their transparent pricing and smooth process made everything stress-free. Strongly recommend their services.

Vishakha Chaudhary

Google review

Google

Had a great experience with Bitronix Technologies. They understood my requirements from the very first call. The process was smooth, communication was clear, and the project was delivered on time. Pricing was fair and transparent with no hidden surprises. Highly recommended!

Md Empire

Google review

Google

Worked with Bitronix Technologies for a blockchain project and honestly couldn't be happier. They delivered everything on time, no delays, no excuses - and the pricing was very reasonable for the quality of work. The team clearly knows their stuff. Highly recommend if you're looking for reliable tech development!

Monty Thakur

Google review

Google

I had a very good experience with Bitronix Technologies. Their team is very smart, helpful, and knows their work well. They completed my project on time and the quality of work was really good. Thank you to the whole team for the hard work and support. I would surely recommend them.

Asif Ali

Google review

Google

Excellent service and communication, fast response and transparent , will do more business in future.

Mohd Shahzad

Google review

Google

A extremely brilliant experience. We are mesmerised by their services and the immense knowledge they have in their field. We certainly look forward to have a great relationship with this company and hope to do many projects together, learning and using their expertise for our business.

M محمد Riaz Vali Sayed

Google review

Google

My experience with Bitronix Technologies was excellent The staff were polite and professional, communication was clear, and the project was completed on schedule. Their transparent pricing and smooth process made everything stress-free. Strongly recommend their services.

Vishakha Chaudhary

Google review

Google

Had a great experience with Bitronix Technologies. They understood my requirements from the very first call. The process was smooth, communication was clear, and the project was delivered on time. Pricing was fair and transparent with no hidden surprises. Highly recommended!

Md Empire

Google review

Google

Worked with Bitronix Technologies for a blockchain project and honestly couldn't be happier. They delivered everything on time, no delays, no excuses - and the pricing was very reasonable for the quality of work. The team clearly knows their stuff. Highly recommend if you're looking for reliable tech development!

Monty Thakur

Google review

Google

I had a very good experience with Bitronix Technologies. Their team is very smart, helpful, and knows their work well. They completed my project on time and the quality of work was really good. Thank you to the whole team for the hard work and support. I would surely recommend them.

Asif Ali

Google review

5.06 Google reviews
View on Google →

Other services

Looking for other services?

Explore neighbouring practices - same delivery bar, shared architectural standards.

Modern city skyline at dusk, representing enterprise-scale infrastructure.

Enterprise Blockchain

Permissioned ledgers for regulated industries

View service
Isometric illustration of smart contract development: digital agreement, blockchain blocks, and security.

Smart Contract Development

Audit-ready contracts, testing, and deployment pipelines

View service
Laptop screen showing JavaScript source code, representing dApp engineering.

dApp Development

Interfaces & backends built for chain edge cases

View service
Documents and workspace representing governance and collective decisions.

DAO Development

Governance contracts, treasury, and voting

View service
Robotic arm and digital interface, representing enterprise AI automation.

AI Automation Systems

Agents, workflows, and integrations with operational guardrails

View service
Bitcoin held in front of a price chart, representing decentralised finance and markets.

DeFi Platforms

AMMs, lending, perpetuals, and yield infrastructure

View service
Team collaborating at a table, representing blockchain consulting and planning.

Blockchain Development

Protocol engineering, node operations, and cross-chain infrastructure

View service
Digital coins representing token issuance and treasury programmes.

Coin & Token Development

Tokenomics, vesting, sale infrastructure, and listing readiness

View service
Digital collectibles concept representing NFT product engineering.

NFT Development

Collections, royalties, minting, and marketplace contracts

View service
Laptop displaying an AI assistant interface, representing generative AI solutions.

Generative AI Solutions

AI-native products, RAG, fine-tuning, evaluation, and multimodal delivery

View service
Gaming setup representing Web3 game development and on-chain economies.

Web3 Game Development

On-chain assets, economies, and smart contract logic

View service

Next step

Ready to launch a tokenization programme regulators, custodians, and allocators trust?

Share your asset class, jurisdictions, and target issuance window - we respond within one business day with a scoped recommendation.

Book a Strategy Call →

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers for issuers, fund administrators, asset managers, and procurement teams - before you enter diligence.

No - and any RWA partner who tells you they do should be a red flag. We are an engineering firm, not a law firm. We do not provide legal opinions on whether your tokenization programme satisfies Reg D, Reg S, Reg A+, MiCA, or any other regulatory framework. That work belongs with qualified securities counsel, and we coordinate closely with the firm you choose. What we do provide is engineering execution against the regulatory structure your counsel defines: encoding their transfer restrictions as on-chain compliance logic, integrating with the qualified custodian or transfer agent they approve, and producing the audit trails and regulatory reporting your compliance team will hand to examiners. We've worked with counsel from major securities firms across multiple jurisdictions - and we run engineering decisions past your counsel at every architecture checkpoint, not just at launch. If you don't have securities counsel engaged yet, we can recommend firms we've worked with before - but engaging counsel is the first step in any RWA programme, before any engineering scoping conversation. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you future regulatory risk.

ERC-3643 (T-REX-style), ERC-1400 family patterns, ERC-1404-style transfer hooks, ERC-4626 vault interfaces where applicable, and custom standards when counsel and auditors sign off. Framework references (for example Reg D / Reg S patterns, MiCA-aligned reporting hooks) are implemented as your counsel specifies - we encode requirements; we do not certify outcomes.

We specify API or message flows, reconciliation cadence, break procedures, and on-chain attestation boundaries - then build integration services and tests against those contracts. Named providers (Anchorage, Fireblocks, BNY Mellon, others) are wired when your programme selects them; we do not imply endorsement from any custodian without your executed arrangement.

Yes - Hyperledger Besu, Quorum, Fabric-adjacent bridging, Canton where applicable, and EVM-compatible private environments. The network choice follows regulatory posture, custodian connectivity, and transfer-agent requirements.

We design signer quorum, heartbeat checks, staleness handling, and failover paths - often integrating Chainlink Proof-of-Reserve or comparable attestations your custodian or fund administrator supports. Scenarios include delayed NAV, partial attestation failure, and custodian rotation.

Yes - jurisdictional matrices, investor eligibility, and lock-up rules are encoded per counsel's transfer restriction schedule. Secondary transfer rules, forced transfers, and administrative freezes are tested against your scenario list.

We integrate with platforms such as Sumsub, Onfido, or your existing stack: credential formats, allowlist updates, revocation, and audit logs. On-chain representation stays minimal; PII stays in approved systems.

Yes - event schemas, export formats, and scheduled reports aligned to your compliance cadence. Your team owns filing obligations; we deliver the technical artifacts and integration points.

Discovery through audit-ready issuance often runs 3-9 months depending on asset class, custodian integration depth, and audit scheduling. Core team: lead contracts engineer, compliance-aware reviewer, integrations engineer - scaled per scope.

Asset class, counsel contact, target jurisdictions, custody and transfer-agent arrangements (or intent to select), investor onboarding stack, reporting cadence, and target issuance window. We respond within one business day with a scoped recommendation.